<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Thesis on CS Theorems</title><link>https://cs.lozic.me/kinds/thesis/</link><description>Recent content in Thesis on CS Theorems</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2026 12:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cs.lozic.me/kinds/thesis/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Church–Turing Thesis</title><link>https://cs.lozic.me/posts/t012-the-church-turing-thesis/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2026 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://cs.lozic.me/posts/t012-the-church-turing-thesis/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="symptom"&gt;Symptom&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Somebody says &amp;ldquo;CSS is Turing-complete&amp;rdquo; and the room splits. Half the people
treat it as a joke about a styling language, the other half as a serious claim
with consequences. Both reactions are common and only one is right.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>