<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Optimization on CS Theorems</title><link>https://cs.lozic.me/areas/optimization/</link><description>Recent content in Optimization on CS Theorems</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2027 12:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cs.lozic.me/areas/optimization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Approximation Algorithms and Ratios</title><link>https://cs.lozic.me/posts/t032-approximation-algorithms-and-ratios/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2027 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://cs.lozic.me/posts/t032-approximation-algorithms-and-ratios/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="symptom"&gt;Symptom&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You have accepted that the problem is NP-hard. Now what?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The literature offers a wall of results with numbers attached: 2-approximation,
$\ln n$-approximation, PTAS, FPTAS, 0.878. Nobody explains what these numbers
buy you, how they are proved, or how they connect to the heuristic you already
wrote. Meanwhile your greedy heuristic is running in production and you have no
idea whether it is within 5% or a factor of 50 of optimal, because &lt;strong&gt;you cannot
compute the optimum to compare against&lt;/strong&gt; — that was the whole problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>